Tuesday, July 22, 2008

Auditing Standard on Related Parties


IAASB Issues Auditing Standard on Related Parties; Makes Further Progress on Clarity Standards
New York July 14, 2008
Following the consideration and approval of due process by the Public Interest Oversight Board (PIOB), the International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB), an independent standard-setting board under the auspices of the International Federation of Accountants (IFAC), today released International Standard on Auditing (ISAs) 550 (Revised and Redrafted), Related Parties and three clarity redrafted ISAs.
Related PartiesThe involvement of related parties in major corporate scandals encouraged the IAASB to revise its current auditing standard on the subject. The revised Related Parties standard clarifies the meaning of "related party" for purposes of an audit. It also makes clear the auditor's responsibility to obtain sufficient evidence about the required accounting and disclosure of related party relationships and transactions and to understand how such relationships and transactions affect the view given by the financial statements.
"The standard will strengthen current auditing practice in this area by emphasizing the need for the auditor to understand related party relationships and transactions in order to identify the risks of material misstatement to which these may give rise, and directing the auditor to focus work effort on the assessed risks of material misstatement, including those due to fraud," explains John Kellas, IAASB Chairman.
"The revised standard clarifies the auditor's responsibilities in those cases where the financial reporting framework establishes minimal or no related party requirements. In addition, it provides enhanced guidance to assist the auditor in understanding and responding to the risks of material misstatement that may arise in relation to related parties with dominant influence," emphasizes Kellas.
Clarity Redrafted ISAsIn addition to ISA 550 (Revised and Redrafted), the IAASB has also released the following clarity redrafted ISAs:
ISA 250 (Redrafted), Consideration of Laws and Regulations in an Audit of Financial Statements;
ISA 510 (Redrafted), Initial Audit Engagements-Opening Balances; and
ISA 570 (Redrafted), Going Concern.
They form part of the IAASB's ambitious 18-month program to redraft existing standards following the clarity drafting conventions.* To date, the IAASB has released 15 final clarity redrafted ISAs. The IAASB is on track to finalize its complete set of clarified ISAs by the end of this year.
The complete set of clarified ISAs, including newly revised standards such as ISA 550 (Revised and Redrafted), will be effective for audits of financial statements for periods beginning on or after December 15, 2009.
The ISAs can be downloaded free-of-charge from the IFAC online bookstore at http://www.ifac.org/store.
About the IAASB and IFACThe objective of the IAASB is to serve the public interest by setting high quality auditing and assurance standards and by facilitating the convergence of international and national standards, thereby enhancing the quality and uniformity of practice throughout the world and strengthening public confidence in the global auditing and assurance profession. The Public Interest Oversight Board oversees the activities of the IAASB and, as one element of that oversight, establishes its due process and working procedures.
IFAC is the global organization for the accountancy profession dedicated to serving the public interest by strengthening the profession and contributing to the development of strong international economies. IFAC is comprised of 157 members and associates in 123 countries and jurisdictions, representing more than 2.5 million accountants in public practice, education, government service, industry and commerce. In addition to setting international auditing and assurance standards through the IAASB, IFAC, through its independent standard-setting boards, sets international ethics, education, and public sector accounting standards. It also issues guidance to encourage high quality performance by professional accountants in business.
* Key elements of the clarity drafting conventions include: establishing an objective for the auditor with respect to the subject matter of each standard; clearly distinguishing requirements from guidance on their application; avoiding ambiguity through eliminating the present tense to describe actions by the auditor and using more imperative language where a requirement was intended; and other structural and drafting improvements to enhance the overall readability and understandability of the standards.
[Source: IFAC]
ABHASH KUMAR
MEMEBR JAB WE MET CA

REDEFINING PROFESSIONALISM........

Fair value rules will not change, says IASB

UK July 11, 2008
The principal body responsible for global accounting rules said it would not dilute the "fair value" standards that critics blame for increasing the scale of credit crisis-related write downs at banks.
The International Accounting Standards Board is pushing ahead with a process to review how the value of assets such as mortgage-backed securities can be established in an illiquid market.
But the rules on "fair value", which dictate that assets should be valued at the price they would fetch in the marketplace, will not change.
A panel established by the board to assess whether it can give companies more guidance on valuing illiquid assets met for the first time last month.
John Smith, a director of the board, said the panel was likely to meet again in the coming months, possibly several times.
There is no fixed timetable for meetings, however, or fixed objectives.
"If there's something to be done, we'd like to do it as quickly as possible. I couldn't tell you when but I would say this year clearly versus sometime further out," Mr Smith said.
Accounting rules drawn up by the board are used in more than 100 countries and are mandatory for companies listed in the EU.
The Institute for International Finance, a lobby group for financial institutions, has said there is a need to clarify some accounting rules.
[Source: The Telegraph]
-- Thanks & Regards
ABHASH KUMAR
JAB WE MET CA
REDEFINING PROFESSONALISM............

IAS-2 ( TECHNICAL SUMMARY)

Technical Summary

This extract has been prepared by IASC Foundation staff and has not been approved by the IASB. For the requirements reference must be made to International Financial Reporting Standards. IAS 2 Inventories
The objective of this Standard is to prescribe the accounting treatment for inventories. A primary issue in accounting for inventories is the amount of cost to be recognised as an asset and carried forward until the related revenues are recognised. This Standard provides guidance on the determination of cost and its subsequent recognition as an expense, including any write-down to net realisable value. It also provides guidance on the cost formulas that are used to assign costs to inventories.
Inventories shall be measured at the lower of cost and net realisable value.
Net realisable value is the estimated selling price in the ordinary course of business less the estimated costs of completion and the estimated costs necessary to make the sale.
The cost of inventories shall comprise all costs of purchase, costs of conversion and other costs incurred in bringing the inventories to their present location and condition.
The cost of inventories shall be assigned by using the first-in, first-out (FIFO) or weighted average cost formula. An entity shall use the same cost formula for all inventories having a similar nature and use to the entity. For inventories with a different nature or use, different cost formulas may be justified. However, the cost of inventories of items that are not ordinarily interchangeable and goods or services produced and segregated for specific projects shall be assigned by using specific identification of their individual costs.
When inventories are sold, the carrying amount of those inventories shall be recognised as an expense in the period in which the related revenue is recognised. The amount of any write-down of inventories to net realisable value and all losses of inventories shall be recognised as an expense in the period the write-down or loss occurs. The amount of any reversal of any write-down of inventories, arising from an increase in net realisable value, shall be recognised as a reduction in the amount of inventories recognised as an expense in the period in which the reversal occurs.

Golden Quotes

To make somebody wrong never makes anything right.....

IFAC’s International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board Issues Strategy and Work Program for 2009-2011

*IFAC's International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board Issues Strategy
and Work Program for 2009-2011*

New York
July 14, 2008

The International Auditing and Assurance Standards Board (IAASB), an
independent standard-setting board under the auspices of the International
Federation of Accountants (IFAC), today released its Strategy and Work
Program, 2009-2011. The three-year strategy includes an emphasis on the
development of standards that contribute to the effective operation of the
world's capital markets and that address the needs of small- and
medium-sized entities and small and medium practices.

The Strategy and Work Program, issued following consideration and approval
of its completeness from a public interest perspective by the Public
Interest Oversight Board (PIOB)*, is consistent with the IAASB's overall
objectives. ** It builds on the strong base of standards developed by the
IAASB to date and focuses on three areas:

- The development of standards;
- The facilitation and monitoring of adoption of those standards; and
- Responding to concerns about the implementation of the standards by
activities designed to improve the consistency with which they are applied
in practice.

"The IAASB's vision is that the high quality standards on assurance, related
services and, in particular, International Standards on Auditing that we
develop in the public interest are adopted and applied internationally. The
strategy and work program are consistent with this longer term vision,"
explains John Kellas, IAASB Chairman.

The Strategy and Work Program responds to significant developments in the
environment in which audit and other assurance services are performed, and
in which standards for such services are set. It also highlights the IAASB
role in working toward global acceptance of and convergence with its
standards and in establishing and maintaining relevant partnerships. It is
underpinned by the IAASB's communications initiatives to keep stakeholders
informed of its activities and to promote adoption and implementation of its
standards.

The Strategy and Work Program reflects the outcome of an extensive
consultation program to obtain the widest possible input into determining
the IAASB's priorities over the next three years. A summary of the IAASB's
conclusions with regard to significant matters raised during these
consultations is presented in the Basis for Conclusions: IAASB Strategy and
Work Program, 2009-2011.

"I am grateful to the many people and organizations that contributed to our
strategy review consultations. I hope that the direction of our work will be
seen as responding to the representations made to us, and to the public
interest, which must be our overriding concern. Of course, events and
circumstances may require us to amend our program, and for this reason it
will be kept under constant review," notes Kellas.

The Strategy and Work Program, 2009-2011 can be downloaded free-of-charge
from the IFAC online bookstore (http://www.ifac.org/store). To access the
related Basis for Conclusions and other information on the IAASB's work,
visit its home page at http://www.iaasb.org/.

*About IFAC*
IFAC is the global organization for the accountancy profession dedicated to
serving the public interest by strengthening the profession and contributing
to the development of strong international economies. IFAC is comprised of
157 members and associates in 123 countries and jurisdictions, representing
more than 2.5 million accountants in public practice, education, government
service, industry and commerce. In addition to setting international
auditing and assurance standards through the IAASB, IFAC, through its
independent standard-setting boards, sets ethics, education, and public
sector accounting standards. It also issues guidance to encourage high
quality performance by professional accountants in business.

*Notes to Editors*

* The PIOB was formally established in February 2005 to oversee IFAC's
auditing and assurance, ethics, and education standard-setting activities as
well as the IFAC Member Body Compliance Program. The objective of the PIOB
is to increase confidence of investors and others that such activities,
including the setting of standards by the IAASB, are properly responsive to
the public interest. PIOB members are nominated by international
institutions and regulatory bodies.

** The objective of the IAASB is: "To serve the public interest by setting,
independently and under its own authority, high quality standards dealing
with auditing, review, other assurance, quality control, and related
services, and by facilitating the convergence of national and international
standards." This objective contributes to enhanced quality and uniformity of
practice in these areas throughout the world and to strengthened public
confidence in financial reporting. The IAASB aims to achieve its objective
through the following strategic initiatives:

(a) Development of Standards - Establish high quality auditing, review,
other assurance, quality control, and related services standards.

(b) Global Acceptance, Convergence and Partnership - Promote the acceptance
and adoption of IAASB pronouncements throughout the world and support a
strong and cohesive international accountancy profession by coordinating
with IFAC member bodies, regional organizations, and national standard
setters to achieve the objective of the IAASB.

(c) Communication - Improve the quality and uniformity of auditing practices
and related services throughout the world by encouraging debate and
presenting papers on a variety of audit and assurance issues and increasing
the public image and awareness of the activities of the IAASB.

[Source: IFAC]


--
Thanks & Regards
ABHASH KUMAR

Bank liable to deduct TDS on MICR charges

*Bank liable to deduct TDS on MICR charges*

New Delhi
July 15, 2008

The Ahmedabad Income-Tax Tribunal has held that where charges are incurred
towards MICR facilities regarding identifying, reading and clearing cheques
through special kind of machines, the same would be in the nature of fees
for technical services (FTS) and would accordingly be liable to deduct tax
at source (TDS) under section 194J. In the relevant case, the assessee was
engaged in the business of banking activities/services. During verification
of the TDS return, the AO observed that the assessee had made payment
towards MICR charges to MICR centre managed by State Bank of India without
deducting TDS. The tribunal held that the definition of the term FTS is very
wide. The services of MICR facilities involve human skills as well as
computerised machines and that it is not automatic. In that sense, it is not
hiring/leasing or making available the technical equipment working on its
own. But it is fully supported by services of personnel and requires human
application of mind along with technical equipment. Since other banks pay
charges for the MICR facilities through its special machines, the same is in
the nature of FTS and therefore, would be exigible to TDS under section
194J.

[Source: The Economic Times]


--
Thanks & Regards
ABHASH KUMAR

Monday, July 21, 2008

Taxability of intangible assets located in India


Transfer of intangible assets located in India

As per Indian Income-tax Act, all incomes accruing or arising, whether directly or indirectly, through the transfer of a capital asset situated in India is liable to Income-tax. Many a times, a controversy arises as to the situs of the asset in India. The controversy is more prominent in case of intangible assets like trademarks, brand-names, etc.
In the above context, recent case of Foster's Australia Ltd (170 Taxman 341) may be referred to. The brief facts of the case are that an Australian company is engaged in brewing, processing and selling of beer products. It owns trademarks, logos, technology and know-how, etc. On Oct, 13, 1997, the company entered into a Brand License (BL) Agreement with Foster's India, an Indian company whereby Foster's India was granted an exclusive license to brew, package, label and sell Foster's beer and an exclusive right of use of the trademarks within the territory of India. The Australian company was paying income-tax on such consideration, treating the same as royalty income.
On August, 4, 2006, the Australian company entered into a sale and purchase (S&P) agreement with SAB Miller, UK in Australia for transfer of shares of Foster India and other intangible assets in the nature of intellectual property.
In the instant case, the prime issue for consideration was as to whether the capital assets transferred through the S&P Agreement are ‘situated in India'. This issue arises since the income arising from the transfer of capital asset situated in India is deemed to be an income liable to be taxed in India as per the explicit mandate of section 9(1).
The Australian company approached the Authority for Advance Ruling for a ruling. It contended that the items of intellectual property covered by the S&P Agreement have no location in India and the situs in this case would be the place of fiscal residence of the owner. Therefore, both the asset and the place of contract being outside India, no income can be charged to tax under the Income-tax Act, 1961.
The department argued that Foster's India is held by Foster's Group, Australia, through the cobweb of its subsidiaries. Though the shares and trademarks and Foster's brand are shown to be sold by two different entities, in effect and in substance, Foster's group, Australia has transferred the ownership of its Indian company, i.e., Foster's India including its tangible as well as intangible assets.
The Authority however observed that: "The situs of these intellectual property assets, in our view, should not be traced and confined only to the place where the contract (India S&P Agreement) was entered into and acted upon by the parties. On the relevant date of transfer, they were very much present in India and the transfer of such assets took place concurrent with the transfer of controlling interest in Foster's India to SAB Miller. At best, their location in Australia is only notional or fictional. The fact that the trade-marks and names originated in Australia and initially registered there does not make material difference."
It was therefore held that the income arising to the Australian company from the transfer of its right, title and interest in the trade-marks and Foster's brand Intellectual Property is taxable in India under the Income-tax Act, 1961.
It is thus clear that intangible assets like trademarks, brand-names etc shall be taken as located in India if they are used in India. Their place of registration in this context is not material.

source-Business standard

Higher TDS rate if PAN not disclosed


The move is being viewed as an effort by the government to expand the taxpayer base.
Companies and individuals who do not reveal their Permanent Account Number (PAN) while receiving income from any source will be liable to pay tax deducted at source (TDS) at the maximum marginal rate of 30 per cent (plus surcharge and education cess).
Under the Income Tax Act, 1961, any income payable to the assessee is liable for TDS by the person or entity making the payment. TDS rate ranges from 1 per cent to 30 per cent depending on the nature of income.
The Central Board of Direct Taxes is considering changes to the Act to this effect.
For example, if a payment is made to a professional like an engineer or a doctor, TDS is deducted at a rate of 10 per cent. If the engineer or doctor fails to provide PAN number, tax will be deducted at the rate of 30 per cent. Similarly, if a contractor does not provide PAN, he will suffer a TDS at the higher rate of 30 per cent instead of 2 per cent now.
"In many situations, contractors or sub-contractors pay the normal TDS but still do not file return of income. By taxing at maximum marginal rate, they will be induced to disclose PAN and file tax return also," said Amitabh Singh, partner, Ernst & Young.
The move is being viewed as an effort by the government to expand the taxpayer base and ramp up revenue collections in view of the huge resource requirement to fund subsidies.
Many assessees do not reveal their PAN to evade taxes and get away with the normal TDS payment. Due to lack of PAN, taxes were often pocketed by deductors also. This creates difficulty in processing tax refunds as well.
PAN quoting has been made mandatory in the e-TDS returns being filed by firms and companies from last year. The tax deductors were facing some difficulty due to reluctant of assessees to prove PAN. The higher TDS rate will force the assessees to reveal the number. Near 100 per cent PAN quoting in TDS returns is important for moving towards dematerialisation of TDS certificates by 2010, the revised deadline set in Budget 2008.
The move is aimed at increasing the effectiveness of TDS provisions to expand the taxpayer base and improve collections. TDS collections constituted 34 per cent of the total Rs 3,14,000 crore direct tax collected in 2007-08.
TDS collections are expected to grow by 55 per cent to Rs 1,65,385 crore in 2008-09, or 45 per cent of the Budget estimate of Rs 3,65,000 crore for 2008-09.

Hiding material facts is concealment

Hiding material facts is concealment
Accepting loan in cash of Rs 20,000 or more is liable for penalty under the income-tax law.

BUSINESS LINE ,Monday, Jul 21, 2008


Taxpayers are expected to declare taxable income by computing it in accordance with the provisions of law.
If a taxpayer files a return of income which he knows is not true or furnishes inaccurate particulars of income then he could be slapped with ‘concealment penalty’.
The minimum penalty leviable is equal to the amount of tax sought to be evaded by concealing the income or furnishing inaccurate particulars thereof. However, the maximum penalty cannot exceed three times the tax sought to be evaded.
In CIT vs Videon (2008 301 ITR 260 Delhi), the assessee disclosed capital gain from sale of land in the original return. Later, a revised return was filed claiming the capital gain, as the transfer was of agricultural land which is an exempted asset.
The assessing officer (AO) did not accept the withdrawal of capital gain by means of revised return and, on appeal, when the matter was remanded by the Tribunal to the AO for reconsideration, the assessee surrendered its claim for exemption.
The AO after charging long-term capital gain (LTCG) to tax also levied concealment penalty.
The court held that the assessee did not hide any material facts and had acted on bona fide belief and on the basis of advice received from Municipal Corporation for claiming the exemption in respect of capital gain on sale of land.
The court held that there was no malicious act or ill intention on the part of the assessee and, hence, penalty is not leviable.

Time limit for rectification
The term ‘order’ refers to assessment orders relating to income and levy of penalty. It also includes orders passed by the appellate authorities. If it contains any error it is to be rectified and necessary provisions are inserted in the statute book to facilitate such rectification. In the case of orders passed by Tribunal, the time limit for rectifying the error is four years from the date of order as per Section 254(2).
In Sree Ayyanar Spinning & Weaving Mills Ltd vs CIT (2008 301 ITR 434 SC) the apex court held that Section 254(2) has two parts — (i) rectification on suo motu basis for which the time limit is four years from the date of order is applicable; and (ii) rectification on the basis of any mistake pointed out by the assessee or AO — for which the time limit of four years is applicable only for pointing out the error and not for passing the order of rectification.
Accordingly, if an application for rectification is filed with the Tribunal within four years from the date of order, the order rectifying the error could be passed by the Tribunal even after the expiry of four years from the date of its earlier order.

Possession of unregistered property
An immovable property could be taken or retained by the prospective buyer by entering into a sale agreement with the seller. If the sale agreement satisfies the requirements of Section 53A of the Transfer of Property Act, 1882 the ownership could be obtained by mere possession without any sale deed or registration thereof.
On sale of such property later, the date of acquisition of ownership must be counted from the date of possessing the property in accordance with sale agreement and not from the date of sale deed or its registration.
In Madathil Brothers vs Deputy CIT (2008 301 ITR 345 Madras), the assessee had possession of property from 1976 based on sale agreement, though the sale deed in favour of the assessee was executed in July 1986 and was registered in September 1986.
The property was sold four days after the registration of the document in the assessee’s favour. The court held that for the purpose of reckoning the ownership tenure, the date of sale agreement and consequent possession thereof was to be considered and not the date of execution of sale deed or its registration. Accordingly it held that the transfer is taxable as LTCG.
In CIT vs G. Saroja (2008 301 ITR 124 Madras) it was held that if there is no sale agreement and granting of possession to the builder or buyer, no capital gain could be charged on deemed basis without any other evidence on record to show transfer of property.

Acceptance of loan by book entries
Accepting loan in cash of Rs 20,000 or more is liable for penalty under the income-tax law. Whether a loan could be accepted by means of book entries was discussed in CIT vs Bombay Conductors & Electricals Ltd (2008 301 ITR 328 Gujarat). In this case, the assessee purchased goods from its holding company. Since it could not pay the money for the purchases made, the due was converted into a loan by means of book entries.
The court held that the objective of introducing Section 269 SS is to curb circulation of black money in the guise of loan or deposit. While introducing Section 269 SS a provision to provide relief based on reasonable cause was inserted by way of Section 273B.
The Tribunal gave a reprieve to the assessee as the book entry was made on bona fide belief that there was no embargo in the statute. The court upheld the reasoning of the Tribunal and held that for a technical or venial breach of law — no penalty is imposable.

Sale of shares
In the case of sale of shares, the date of transfer would be the date of execution of contract of sale provided it is followed by actual delivery of shares and transfer deeds.
The CBDT Circular No.704 dated April 28, 1995, says that the contract for purchase or sale of securities entered by the broker shall be taken as the date of transfer for the purpose of computing capital gain. It was so held in Max Telecom Ventures Ltd vs Assistant CIT (2008 301 ITR AT 90 Amritsar).
It may be noted that if the shares were held for more than 12 months and the sale is effected through a recognised stock exchange in India and is covered by securities transaction tax, such LTCG arising on transfer is exempt under Section 10(38).(The author is an Erode-based chartered accountant.)

Debenture issue expenses

Debenture issue expenses are fully allowable even if they are fully or partly convertible in to shares.

Summary:
On issue of debentures capital is borrowed. A conversion of debenture in to shares may take place later on, however, that will not change the factum of borrowing of capital. Therefore, expenses in connection with issue of fully or partly convertible debentures are to be considered as expenses for borrowing capital. In such a case any part of debenture issue expenses cannot be disallowed as expenses for raising share capital. In this write-up related issues are discussed in light of a recently reported judgment of Madras high Court.
Debenture or bond:
Debenture or bond is an instrument to raise loan by issuing securities. The advantage of raising loan through such instrument is that the security is marketable and the holder can sell it in the market if he wants to realize money before it is due from the issuer on redemption. By issuing debentures and bonds money can be raised from several persons on the same terms and conditions without separate agreements. This is because the terms and condition of the issue of debentures or bonds are equally applicable to all holders of such debentures or bonds. Thus, small savings can also be mobilized by issue of bonds and debentures.
Convertible debenture(PCD)
Convertible or partly convertible debentures are also instrument to raise money by issue of debenture or bond i.e. loan capital. The terms of issue prescribes that the money is obtained as a loan bearing some interest and that after some time or on certain intervals, some part or parts of debenture money will be converted into equity shares at the price decided at the time of issue or to be decided in future. The debenture may be fully convertible (FCD) or partly convertible (PCD).
Money raised is money borrowed :
When debenture or bond is issued, the issuer company does not receive share capital. Money raised by issue of FCD or PCD is in nature of capital borrowed and not in nature of share capital. Therefore, the principles relating to expenses in connection with borrowing of money, apply to the issue of bonds or debentures whether they be fully or partly convertible or non-convertible.
Partly convertible debenture
In case of issue of partly convertible debenture, the following transactions take place in due course of time.
1) Application is made for issue / allotment of debentures / bond.
2) Debenture or bonds are issued or allotted and therefore, issuing company credits the loan account which is taken by way of issue of debenture or bond.
3) On the occasion of conversion, certain part of debenture is paid up by issue of shares and therefore, at this stage, the transaction of discharge liability against debenture or bond and raising of share capital arises.
Issue of capital is a future and contingent event:
In these cases we find that issue of share capital takes place in future and not at the time of issue of debenture or bond. The expenses incurred at the time of issue of bonds or debentures cannot therefore be considered as expenses for raising of share capital.
As noted earlier generally in case of convertible debentures FCD/PCD, the terms for issue of shares are decided beforehand and sometimes they are decided later on. Sometimes, conversion is compulsory and sometimes it may optional. Even in case of compulsory conversion stipulated at the time of issue of debenture, it is in one way optional for the investor because if an investor does not want to wait till the stipulated date of allotment of shares, he can sell debentures. Therefore, the buyer will be entitled to receive share and not the original subscriber. In some situations if there is major change in circumstances the terms and conditions of issue of debentures and shares may be altered or varied by the debenture holders through proper legal course by holding debenture holders' meeting and by changing the terms and conditions etc. Therefore, it can be said that it is not necessary that the person who receives debenture as a subscriber will receive the shares also or that shares will in fact be issued. Therefore, the issue of shares is not a surety but there remain many contingencies. Longer the period of conversion larger will be contingencies.
Certain conversion at the time of allotment
In past we had seen that several issues of PCD's in which case certain part of debentures was converted into equity shares simultaneously at the time of allotment of debenture. Therefore, in such a case debenture application money remained as capital borrowed and on allotment of debenture a part of it got converted into equity shares and part into debenture or bond. But so far the debenture application money was concerned, it was a borrowed capital.
The issue expenses:
In case of issue of debentures certain expenses are incurred for complying with statutory requirements, advertisement, stamp duty, statutory fees and other issue expenses. The controversy arises as to allowability of such expenses. If the debentures are issued then capital is borrowed, and borrowing of capital is in usual course of business and it does not create an advantage of enduring nature, in capital field, and therefore all expenses incurred in connection with issue of debentures or otherwise raising loan are allowable as revenue expenses.
A recent judgment of Madras High Court
In CIT v. South India Corpn.(Agencies) Ltd.
[2007] 164 Taxman 249(Mad.) section 37(1) of the Income-tax Act, 1961relating to allowability of business expenditure in assessment years 1989-90 and 1992-93 was considered. The assessee claimed full deduction of expenses incurred on debenture issue. The Assessing Officer on consideration of partly convertible nature of debentures, treated 60 per cent of issue expenses as capital expenditure and balance as revenue expenditure. He was of the view that at time of redemption, debenture holders would be entitled to certain shares, therefore expenses were partly to raise share capital. In appeal before the Tribunal, it was held that issue of shares was a future event which may or may not happen, and as in instant case, expenditure incurred was on issue of debenture only, such expenditure was revenue expenditure.
The revenue challenged the order of Tribunal on issue whether Tribunal was justified in allowing entire expenses as revenue expenses by way of following question:
"Whether, on the facts and circumstances of the case, the Tribunal was right in holding that the 60 per cent of the expenses incurred on partly convertible debentures had to be allowed as deduction?"
The Assessing Officer as well as the Commissioner of Income-tax (Appeals) considered 60 per cent of the claim of debenture issue expenses as capital expenditure. Thus the assessee filed an appeal before the Income-tax Appellate Tribunal. On consideration of facts, the Tribunal held as follows:
"The last of the issues is with regard to expenses incurred on debenture issue being treated as capital expenditure. The authorities have treated part of the expenditure as capital expenditure on the reasoning that at the time of redemption of the debenture, the holders of the debentures were entitled to certain shares. The issue of shares is a future event which may or may not happen. At present, the expenditure incurred was on the issue of debentures only and hence the expenses incurred on obtaining a loan is revenue expenditure. We accordingly uphold the claim of the assessee."
On revenues appeal the High Court considered the facts found by the Tribunal and decided cases laws on the issue of expenses in connection with borrowing and noted as follows:
The Assessing Officer bifurcated the expenditure and allowed only 40 per cent as revenue expenditure, without any basis.
The Tribunal correctly held that the disallowance of 60 per cent is without any basis and the Assessing Officer was wrong in treating part of the expenditure as capital expenditure on the reasoning that at the time of redemption of debentures, the holders of the debentures would be entitled to certain shares.
The issue of shares is a future event which may or may not happen.
The Tribunal considered and followed the principles enunciated in the Apex Court judgment in India Cements Ltd. V. CIT [1966] 60 ITR 52, which in fact, followed by the Delhi High Court in CIT v. Thirani Chemicals Ltd. [2007] 290 ITR 196 holding that expenditure incurred on the issue of debentures is a permissible deduction under section 37 of the Act.
During course of hearing Learned counsel appearing for the Revenue has not produced any material or evidence to take a different view.
The reasoning of the Tribunal was based on relevant materials and evidence.
There is no error or infirmity in the order of the Tribunal to warrant interference.
In view of the above , the High Court held that no substantial question of law arises for consideration by the court and hence, the appeal in respect of the question on this issue (Question no. 1) was dismissed.
Conclusion:
Debenture issue expenses are normal revenue expenses incurred to raise borrowed capital. In case of an existing business, or for extension of the business borrowing is a normal activity therefore expenses incurred for borrowing of capital are allowable. However, in view of fact that tenure of loan may spread over a period beyond the year of accrual of such expenses, specific provision can be made to amortize such expenses over the period of loan raised by way of loan or by way of debentures or bonds. In absence of specific prohibition or specific method of amortization, such expenses preferably need to be claimed fully in the year of accrual. Amortization over the period of instrument or loan, if followed in accounts can be another way of claiming the expenses following matching principal of accounting. The fact that a portion of debenture amount may be converted into share capital in future, will not change the character of expenses.
Immediate conversion or conversion after short period:
Author remember that in some cases there was part conversion of debentures into equity immediately on allotment of debenture or shortly thereafter. In such cases the revenue authorities can possibly take view that the issue of shares has been made in a disguised manner. Therefore, it is always advisable that the terms and conditions should be such that bonafide cannot be questioned. An option to covert debenture into shares can be a reasonable safeguard to establish bonafide terms and conditions. A compulsory conversion immediately on allotment or after a short spell of time, may draw adverse inference.

About the Author: -
Uma Kothari